Recipes With Tortillas, The Importance Of Language Essay, Stōk Cold Brew Coffee Pumpkin, Cereal With Least Sugar, Ps5 Frame Rate, Member's Mark French Vanilla Cappuccino Mix, Performance Marine Regina, Pillsbury Funfetti Cupcake Mix Directions, Steviol Glycosides Glycemic Index, Saskatchewan Highway Construction Updates, 959 Cubic Inch Motor In Liters, Oldest Building Still In Use, Combustion Of Ethane, Outdoor Lounge Furniture Rental, Boreal Valley Ost, Grey Hair Color, Sugar Withdrawal Symptoms Headache, Weber Spirit E-320 Dimensions, Sudden Stomach Sensitivity To Coffee, Is Vinegar Good For You, Memorial Canvas Collage, Fina Estampa Restaurant Menu, Jai Chiranjeeva Movie Writer, Zach Sherwin Height, Network Interface Card Pdf, How To Update Xbox 360 Games, Toyota Parts Canada, Distance From Medicine Hat To Regina, Hazel Brown Hex Code, Kaddu Vegetable In English, Iceberg Lettuce Nutritional Value, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Wiki, " />

diane hartley citicorp

Wind tunnel tests with models of Citigroup Center revealed that the wind speed required to bring down the building would occur every 16 years on average." Where is LeMussurier's Name? "... the building has a tuned mass damper, which also negates much of the wind load. - The Chase tower, however, was far better architecturally than 399 Park Avenue because of its great plaza with its sculptural tree by Dubuffet and its sunken rock garden and fountain by Isamu Noguchi and its overall, piered design. Boston Properties as even changed the URL to 601lexington.com. I would recommend creating a redirect for 601 Lexington Ave. though if it doesn't already exist. I'm inclined to agree we should leave it. —howcheng {chat} 20:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC), The article states "The roof of Citigroup Center slopes at a 45-degree angle because it was originally intended to contain solar panels to provide energy. Rough consensus that the request is premature.Cúchullain t/c 14:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC), Citigroup Center → 601 Lexington Ave. – Because the official name of the building is now 601 Lexington, it is a good idea to rename the article to the suggested name above as per WP:COMMONNAME. Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC). I don't think that this building is nicknamed the lipstick building. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. There should be a Wiki page about this woman: Diane Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. When the Citicorp story broke in 1995, Hartley did not believe she was the undergraduate student LeMessurier referenced. It appears to have been written by someone with barely any English skills, or may have been machine translated from another language. However, since I can't comprehend what's written, at present I feel unable to fix it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydrargyrum (talk • contribs) 06:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC), It seems to me the article ought to be moved now to 601 Lexington Avenue; see http://rew-online.com/2016/07/28/boston-properties-to-rename-rebrand-601-lexington-avenue/, http://newyorkyimby.com/2016/05/landmarks-calendars-seven-midtown-east-buildings-for-designation.html, and more. Either one of the figures is wrong or the section should be rewritten to make clear that the two paragraphs are actually talking about the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.74.87.105 (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC), the address is 153 E 53rd St, btw 3rd Ave and Lex. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. There seem to be some instances where opinion is presented instead of a NPOV. Though, I can imagine that one block may not make much of a difference and "53rd and 3rd" may have been chosen for lyrical reasons (to the extent that the Ramones could be considered "lyrical").63.111.32.66 (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC), I don't think that being mentioned in a song really qualifies as a "notable feature" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.50.89 (talk) 23:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC), In the section about the engineering crisis, I question the comment that New Yorker article criticized LeMessurier. -Sentence doesn't make sense (under heading Sale) "Despite previously Citicorp, ... Diane Hartley. However, this idea was eventually dropped because the positioning of the angled roof meant that the solar panels would not face the sun directly.". Please take a moment to review my edit. Having read the article many times, it does nothing but praise LeMessurier for his actions. It was she who had discovered the design loads design fatality, and communicated it to the design firm (who had no choice but to act since she was capable of escalation awareness of the problem that she found. My recollection (and, alas, I've been unable to verify) is that the roof was originally intended to slope in another direction and was just an artistic feature but that the Greenie Weenies convinced Citicorp to reorient it during construction. David Billington, Diane Hartley’s undergraduate thesis advisor reports that because the columns or “legs” of the Citicorp Tower were in the middle of each side, rather than at the building’s corners, he, too, had specific concerns about the effects of quartering winds. I did a Google search on the text of this article, and found that most of it is taken word for word from the following site: http://www.thecityreview.com/citicorp.html, It is too bad that this article has gone down, although not as bad as when the City Review stuff was added. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. The 59 Story Crisis that is linked at the bottom of the page. Anyway, I'm just wondering if the "slope change", so to speak, jogs anyone's memory. Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC), There should be a Wiki page about this woman: Diane Hartley. The bolts could shear and the building could collapse. ACanadianToker (talk) 19:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC), I've been reading, writing and speaking English for most of my life, but after reading and re-reading the "Sale" section of the article, I can't make anything of it. In fact, Diane Hartley had spoken to LeMessurrier's junior engineer Joel Weinstein. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:45, 20 September 2016‎. It was she who had discovered the design loads design fatality, and communicated it to the design firm (who had no choice but to act since she was capable of escalation awareness of the problem that she found. It is generally thought that his forthrightness so impressed the executives that they decided to … I believe that someone has confused the facts - the lipstick building, to my knowledge, is the lower, stacked, oval-shaped, red-granite building seen in the foreground of the Citi-corp picture (designed by architect Phillip Johnson)... perhaps someone could verify this? If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. The problem was discovered in 1978, when structural engineer William LeMussurier’s staff had a discussion with a Princeton University civil engineering student named Diane Hartley. Hence it now slopes towards the sun (not quite exactly, but about as good as you'd get in a NYC building block). I understand the above discussion (I only came here after reading this article that has no mention of the new name: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/france-s-trains-are-too-wide-6-notorious-engineering-oversights-1.2649413 ) but think the title should reflect the name of the building -perhaps with a redirect from Citigroup Center. -Sentence doesn't make sense (under heading Sale) "Despite previously Citicorp, acquired several low-and mid-rise buildings in the area, probably just because then Chairman Walter B. Wriston surveyed the view from his windows and told someone to “get rid of those massage parlors”" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.138.43 (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC). If not, what's there now? This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018). (Telephone interview June 30, 2010.) ", As written, these seem to be describing two different situations: the frequency of a wind load that would sheer the bolts in general and the frequency of a load that would sheer the bolts if the damper failed. But both are given as 16 years. According to the article, the address of the building is not 601 Lexington Avenue as, If this move is conducted, the target should be, If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with, If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with, This page was last edited on 13 October 2020, at 13:42. I think the article would be improved if sentences such as these were either removed, or modified to represent a neutral point of view. I think it should be the new name, 601 Lexington Avenue (Formerly Citigroup Center). See also. I have just modified 4 external links on Citigroup Center. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). Citicorp spent five years and approximately $40 million to purchase all but one portion of the entire block. wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC), The result of the proposal was no move. As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.193.167.51 (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions, feel free to buzz me at my talk page. 'it is a concrete block that slides on a thick layer of oil and converts the kinetic energy of the building into friction' - I think this might be a bit of a misleading description, it is certainly not how I understand a tuned mass damper to work but I have no specific knowledge of this building, can anybody shed light? The quote can be found at the end of the fifth-to-last paragraph of the article. Too bad. For example (highlighted in bold): - That same year, Chase Manhattan Bank, First National's chief rival, opened its mammoth new headquarters, designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, downtown, forever changing, for the worse, Lower Manhattan's romantic skyline. The damper is electrically activated, so if power failed, for example during a hurricane, the damper might not turn on,[15] and a much lower-speed wind would suffice; wind of this speed occurs on average once in 16 years. (Gary Joseph 18:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)), Dinosnake 01:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Added details of chevron functionality, clarified failure mode of building and specified construction changes were cause of problem, not LeMessurier's original design - Dinosnake, 7 May 2006. No mention in this article. It needs severe work, or a complete re-write. I know they were considering adding these more recently but haven't been able to confirm the current status. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. relisting Andrewa (talk) 12:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 21:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC), I was wondering if there was any new input on the proposed title move. Even if the name changed the common name that people know it by is Citigroup center so I think it should stay with that. 99.42.89.21 (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC), "...the load from a 70 miles per hour (110 km/h) hurricane force quartering wind would exceed the strength of the bolted-joint chevrons. LeMessurier claimed to have spoken directly with a male undergraduate student writing his senior thesis on the Citicorp building that was under construction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.14.96 (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC), The line in the last paragraph discussing the engineering crisis, specifically the part about it being one of the most structurally sound buildings inthe world, can be found in The New Yorker article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.112.146.199 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC), The Ramones song references 53rd and 3rd, not 53rd and 4th where this building is situated. "SOLAR ENERGY DEHUMIDIFICATION EXPERIMENT on the CITICORP CENTER BUILDING", http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/31243/MIT-EL-77-005-03660453.pdf. The photos of the ground floor are gone, and the general tone of the article still has a "point of view" in it. Diane Hartley As for LeMessurier, the executives at Citicorp asked no more than the $2 million his insurance policy covered, despite the fact that the repairs alone cost over $8 million. I have just modified 2 external links on Citigroup Center.

Recipes With Tortillas, The Importance Of Language Essay, Stōk Cold Brew Coffee Pumpkin, Cereal With Least Sugar, Ps5 Frame Rate, Member's Mark French Vanilla Cappuccino Mix, Performance Marine Regina, Pillsbury Funfetti Cupcake Mix Directions, Steviol Glycosides Glycemic Index, Saskatchewan Highway Construction Updates, 959 Cubic Inch Motor In Liters, Oldest Building Still In Use, Combustion Of Ethane, Outdoor Lounge Furniture Rental, Boreal Valley Ost, Grey Hair Color, Sugar Withdrawal Symptoms Headache, Weber Spirit E-320 Dimensions, Sudden Stomach Sensitivity To Coffee, Is Vinegar Good For You, Memorial Canvas Collage, Fina Estampa Restaurant Menu, Jai Chiranjeeva Movie Writer, Zach Sherwin Height, Network Interface Card Pdf, How To Update Xbox 360 Games, Toyota Parts Canada, Distance From Medicine Hat To Regina, Hazel Brown Hex Code, Kaddu Vegetable In English, Iceberg Lettuce Nutritional Value, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Wiki,

No Comments Yet.

Leave a comment

error: Content is protected !!